Δεν ήξερα για το Σουηδικό μοντέλο, ευχαριστώ για την ενημέρωση.blackpaint έγραψε: ↑20 Ιαν 2020, 16:08Στη Σουηδια που εκλεισαν, το φαινομενο τραφφικινγκ μειωθηκε ριζικα.
Αλλά τώρα που το κοιτάζω, υπάρχουν και οι εξής παράμετροι.
The report also acknowledged Internet (indoor) prostitution as an expanding market, which is more difficult to study and verify than street prostitution, and which, in the last five years, has increased in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark; however, it stated, concurring with the NIKK report (above), that "the scale of this form of prostitution is more extensive in our neighbouring countries, and there is nothing to indicate that a greater increase in prostitution over the Internet has occurred in Sweden than in these comparable countries.
This indicates that the ban has not led to street prostitution in Sweden shifting arenas to the Internet." It also stated that there was no evidence of an increase of abuse towards the prostitutes and of worse living conditions for prostitutes. "As far as we can judge from the written material, and the contacts we have had with public officials and people involved in prostitution, these fears have not been realized", concurring with the Board of Welfare assessment (above) that persons in prostitution are not worse off as an effect of the law.
Το ίντερνετ δηλαδή εκτόνωσε την κατάσταση. Εδώ όπως είδαμε προηγουμένως υπάρχει το ζήτημα της φοροδιαφυγής γιατί τα λεφτά που δίδονται θεωρούνται δωρεές.
Επίσης
Does the Swedish model work?
There is no evidence that levels of sex work have declined as the law intended. The Swedish model may be challenged on two key points: 1 The Swedish model has failed in its aim to decrease levels of sex work in Sweden. 2 The Swedish model has resulted in increased difficulties and danger associated with sex work.
Επίσης
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/3kw4 ... nd-the-law
Αλλά μπορούμε εφόσον υπάρχει το αίτημα, να το βάλουμε κάτω και να το τεστάρουμε κι εδώ, να δούμε πώς θα πάει.
Φιλελεύθερο πάντως δεν είναι. Είναι κρατιστικό.
.
