Στον Καναδά ξεπέρασαν και την φαντασία του Όργουελ

[Ασέβαστος]

Καλά στην Ελλάδα σε βάζουν φυλακή επειδή άναψες ένα καπνογόνο επειδή πήρε το Τσάμπιονς λιγκ ο Ολυμπιακός η τσακωθηκες στο καφενείο για τον βαζελο, του ξεπεράσαμε όλους.

μακαρι αυτο να ηταν αληθεια.

[Σενέκας]

στο μεταξύ, το νομοσχέδιο κυρίως έχει στόχο τις εταιρίες social medial και ο στόχος είναι να τις υποχρεώσει να προσέχουν περισσότερο τι ανεβαίνει στον χώρο τους. Επιπλέον, το focus είναι η αυστηροποίηση των ποινών σχετικά με ηλεκτρονικά εγκλήματα κατά ανηλίκων, κυρίως παιδική πορνογραφία. Γι'αυτούς του λόγους, η δεξιά στον Καναδά στηρίζει το νομοσχέδιο, αλλά μάλλον η δεξιά στην Ελλάδα και το pronews δεν πήραν το memo

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has been a staunch critic of the government’s plan to regulate the online space, including previous laws aimed at regulating streaming platforms and forcing big tech companies to compensate news agencies.

When it comes to the online harms legislation, Poilievre has toned down his criticism significantly, saying he believes children should be protected from online dangers by police and the courts and not “pushed off to a new bureaucracy.”

https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/ca ... edia-safer

[Σενέκας]

επίσης, αυτή που ξεκίνησε τις θεωρίες συνωμοσίας και τις οργουελικές ρητορικές, είναι η Μάργκαρετ Ατγουτ, η τύπισσα που έγραψε το handmaiden's tail

[Σενέκας]

About the proposed Online Harms Bill
On February 26, 2024, the Government of Canada introduced Bill C-63 to create a new Online Harms Act—a baseline standard for online platforms to keep Canadians safe—to hold online platforms accountable for the content they host. Bill C-63 will create stronger protections for kids online and better safeguard everyone in Canada from online hate. The bill sets out a new vision for safer and more inclusive participation online.

The proposed Online Harms Act would specifically target seven types of harmful content:

Content that sexually victimizes a child or revictimizes a survivor;

Intimate content communicated without consent;

Content used to bully a child;

Content that induces a child to harm themselves;

Content that foments hatred;

Content that incites violence; and

Content that incites violent extremism or terrorism.

Under the Act, social media services would be subject to three duties:

A duty to act responsibly;
A duty to protect children; and
A duty to make certain content inaccessible, specifically (1) content that sexually victimizes a child or revictimizes a survivor and (2) intimate images posted without consent.
These duties would apply to social media services including livestreaming and user-uploaded adult content services. They would require these services to actively reduce the risk of exposure to harmful content on their services; to provide clear and accessible ways to flag harmful content and block users; to put in place special protections for children; to take action to address child sexual exploitation and the nonconsensual posting of intimate content, including deepfake sexual images; and to publish transparency reports.

The Bill also proposes changes to the Criminal Code, the Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA), and An Act respecting the mandatory reporting of internet child pornography by persons who provide an internet service.

The changes to the Criminal Code and CHRA would help to better combat hate speech and hate crimes, provide improved remedies for victims and hold individuals accountable for the hatred they spread. Changes to the Mandatory Reporting Act would support investigations into serious crime related to child pornography.

The Act would establish a Digital Safety Commission of Canada and a Digital Safety Ombudsperson of Canada, supported administratively by a Digital Safety Office. The Commission would oversee and enforce the new regulatory framework and the Ombudsperson would act as a resource and advocate for users and victims.

This Bill is an essential step forward in ensuring the safety and wellbeing of Canadians on social media platforms.

Expected outcomes of the proposed legislation
The Online Harms Act aims to hold online platforms accountable for the harmful content they host. It also aims to instill greater transparency around how this harmful content is managed on the service.

All people in Canada would benefit from:

Special protections for children and stronger reporting of child pornography;
Public oversight of and accountability from online services, including better data on how they protect their users;
Strengthened Criminal Code provisions against hate; and
Improved safety over time, both online and in communities.
The Bill would give all people in Canada the tools to:

Flag harmful content and request removal of content that (1) sexually victimizes children or revictimizes survivors and (2) intimate images posted without consent;
Submit complaints and report non-compliance to the Digital Safety Commission;
Contact Digital Safety Ombudsperson to receive support and be directed to the right resources; and
File complaints with the Canadian Human Rights Commission when facing hate speech online.

https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-herit ... harms.html

[micmic]

Αυτό το βλέπω στις ειδήσεις από το 2014: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/ ... rs-toughen

[Σενέκας]

Αυτό το βλέπω στις ειδήσεις από το 2014: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/ ... rs-toughen

πρόκειται για το κλασσικό φαινόμενο των αμερικάνων ακροδεξιών που σπέρνουν φόβο διαδίδοντας ότι ο Καναδάς είναι μια κομμουνιστική δυστοπία και ότι πρέπει να πάρουμε τα μέτρα μας μη γίνουμε σαν αυτούς κοκ. Στην πραγματικότητα η δεξιά στον Καναδά είναι υπερ, γιατί ποιος θα μπορούσε να είναι κατά σε ένα νομοσχέδιο που προωθεί μεγαλύτερη προστασία στα παιδιά στο διαδίκτυο και μέτρα κατά της παιδικής πορνογραφίας

[Green Dragon]

Τι μαλάκες οι Καναδοί, πως είναι δυνατό να ψήφισαν αυτήν την νεοταξίτικη λούγκρα, τον Τριντό;

[Σενέκας]

Τι μαλάκες οι Καναδοί, πως είναι δυνατό να ψήφισαν αυτήν την νεοταξίτικη λούγκρα, τον Τριντό;

"νεοταξίτικη λούγκρα" επειδή παίρνει μέτρα κατά της παιδεραστίας, του bullying και της κακοποίησης μέσω ιντερνετ?

[axilmar]

Ο Τρουντω ειναι στην αιχμη του δορατος του WEF. Κανει οτι μπορει δλδ το παιδι για τον Κλαους...

[nowhere]

το θεματάκι είναι στα Content that foments hatred - Content that incites violence.ποιος θα τα ορίσει αυτά?

[Σενέκας]

το θεματάκι είναι στα Content that foments hatred - Content that incites violence.ποιος θα τα ορίσει αυτά?

το δικαστήριο

Government officials say online hate speech would have to portray a group as "inherently violent" or "unhuman" to meet the threshold for investigation by a human-rights tribunal under a newly proposed law.

Justice officials briefed reporters Wednesday about Criminal Code provisions in the government's new bill to tackle online harms, known as Bill C-63.

The changes have come under harsh criticism from civil liberties groups and legal experts who are voicing concerns about the potential chill on free speech.

They also come after Liberals received significant pushback -- especially from the Opposition Conservatives -- on other legislation to regulate tech giants for their streaming platforms and their use of news content.


Virani says new measures meant to help prevent hate crimes will come with safeguards
Online harms: Civil liberty, law critics say stiffer hate crime sentences 'troubling'
Facebook whistleblower calls Canada's online harms bill 'one of the best proposed today'
Bill C-63, also known as the Online Harms Act, seeks to introduce harsher penalties for existing offences. It would allow sentences of up to five years behind bars for hate propaganda, up from the current two years. It would also allow a judge to impose lifetime imprisonment for advocating genocide.

Such moves are "draconian," the Canadian Civil Liberties Associated has warned, adding that they could stifle public discourse, including through "criminalizing political activism."

The legislation is landing in the middle of a debate, prompted by the Israel-Hamas war, around what constitutes hate speech versus free speech, and what should be considered the threshold for advocating genocide.

Hamas militants killed 1,200 people and took 250 more hostage in an attack on southern Israel on Oct. 7. Israel has retaliated in a war that has killed more than 30,000 Palestinians, according to officials in the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip.

Amid widespread protests in Canada and abroad, advocates have been raising the alarm about hate-motivated attacks on Jewish and Muslim people.

Jewish advocacy groups have called for more police action, saying demonstrators have crossed into antisemitic and hateful behaviour.

Pro-Palestinian protesters have said they feel vilified, and Muslim organizations have raised concerns about people being censored because of their comments about the war.

Justice officials, who spoke to journalists on the condition they not be named, underscored that a high threshold would need to be met for a court to convict someone of advocating genocide.

Not only does a provincial attorney general have to sign off on such a charge, but a judge would need to be satisfied that an individual "is directly seeking others to prompt or provoke others to commit genocide."

A chant heard at some protests since the war -- "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free" -- has been at the centre of the debate over where the line is when it comes to hate speech.

Some Jewish groups have said it calls for the destruction of Israel, which lies between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, and should therefore be considered hate speech or advocating genocide.

Palestinian protesters and other supporters have said it is simply a call for freedom and equality.

Last fall, a man whose lawyer said he had chanted the phrase was charged in Calgary with causing a disturbance with a hate motivation. The charge was eventually stayed.

The primary focus of the Liberal government's bill is to tackle online hate by introducing a new regulator for social media companies.

But it also proposes to reintroduce a section of the Canadian Human Rights Act that would allow people to file complaints against those who post online hate speech.

Officials said the bill includes an improved version of language that was removed under the former Conservative government of Stephen Harper.

Known as Section 13, the original version sparked concerns from critics, including Conservative MPs, about its potential impact on free-speech rights.

It defined hate speech as anything "likely to expose a person or persons to hatred or contempt" on the basis of their race, gender, religion or other prohibited ground of discrimination

In both its human-rights legislation and the Criminal Code, the government is now seeking to define hate speech as "content that expresses detestation or vilification."

Under the proposed law, an individual or group would be able to file a complaint about online hate speech to the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

Officials said the commission would screen for unfounded complaints and forward legitimate ones to a tribunal for a hearing.

Remedies could include the perpetrator being ordered to take down their posts or pay a victim up to $20,000 in damages, a penalty that would increase to $50,000 if they refuse to comply, department officials said.

Speech considered worthy of action includes anything that would "portray groups as inherently violent, as unhuman and worthy of execution or banishment," an official said.

It would not include content that criticizes or belittles a group and attacks its dignity through jokes, ridicule or insults. Content that argues for taking away the rights of a group would not meet the bar as "detestation or vilification" either, the official said.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published March 6, 2024.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/governm ... -1.6797025

[ΣΑΤΑΝΙΚΟΣ ΕΓΚΕΦΑΛΟΣ]

για να σκούζουν οι προβατίνες κάτι καλό θα έκανε πάλι ο νουνεχής τριντώ

[Imperium]

Τι μαλάκες οι Καναδοί, πως είναι δυνατό να ψήφισαν αυτήν την νεοταξίτικη λούγκρα, τον Τριντό;

Σε αυτό είναι σαν τους Έλληνες, Trudeau σε μετάφραση σημαίνει Παπανδρέου.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_Trudeau

[vantono]

για να σκούζουν οι προβατίνες κάτι καλό θα έκανε πάλι ο νουνεχής τριντώ

[nowhere]

το δικαστήριο

με βάση ένα ηλίθιο νόμο που μπορεί να γίνει λάστιχο.προτιμώ μια διαδικτυακή κατάσταση φόρουμ χ10