Γουτ δε φουκNero έγραψε: ↑20 Μάιος 2019, 15:43shameless plugging. Όποιος νομίζει ότι η αιρετική μοναρχία με φεουδαλικές δομές είναι κάποιο είδους επανάσταση είναι πολύ γελασμένος
Πολωνο-Λιθουανική κοινοπολιτεία ή το ιστορικό Westeros


Γουτ δε φουκNero έγραψε: ↑20 Μάιος 2019, 15:43shameless plugging. Όποιος νομίζει ότι η αιρετική μοναρχία με φεουδαλικές δομές είναι κάποιο είδους επανάσταση είναι πολύ γελασμένος
Πολωνο-Λιθουανική κοινοπολιτεία ή το ιστορικό Westeros
Ήτανε γλυκοτσούτσουνος και περίμενε σεξάκι.Η τρελή Daenerys αντί να υποπτεύεται πρώτον απ' όλους το Jon παραμένει θανάσιμα συναισθηματικά ευάλωτη απέναντι του και του επιτρέπει να τη δολοφονήσει σα να ήταν μία άσημη χωρίς καμία προστασία.
Έχω κι άλλη σχετική απορία. Πως διάολο θα συνεχιζόταν η μνήμη της ανθρωπότης
Αν κανείς το βρίσκει ενδιαφέρον, εδώ η συνέχεια.Game of Thrones, in its eighth and final season, is as big as television gets these days. More than 17 million people watched the season’s opening. Judging by the fan and critic reaction though, it seems that a substantial portion of those millions are loathing the season. Indeed, most of the reviews and fan discussions seem to be pondering where the acclaimed series went wrong, with many theories on exactly why it went downhill.
The show did indeed take a turn for the worse, but the reasons for that downturn goes way deeper than the usual suspects that have been identified (new and inferior writers, shortened season, too many plot holes). It’s not that these are incorrect, but they’re just superficial shifts. In fact, the souring of Game of Thrones exposes a fundamental shortcoming of our storytelling culture in general: we don’t really know how to tell sociological stories.
At its best, GOT was a beast as rare as a friendly dragon in King’s Landing: it was sociological and institutional storytelling in a medium dominated by the psychological and the individual. This structural storytelling era of the show lasted through the seasons when it was based on the novels by George R. R. Martin, who seemed to specialize in having characters evolve in response to the broader institutional settings, incentives and norms that surround them.
After the show ran ahead of the novels, however, it was taken over by powerful Hollywood showrunners David Benioff and D. B. Weiss. Some fans and critics have been assuming that the duo changed the narrative to fit Hollywood tropes or to speed things up, but that’s unlikely. In fact, they probably stuck to the narrative points that were given to them, if only in outline form, by the original author. What they did is something different, but in many ways more fundamental: Benioff and Weiss steer the narrative lane away from the sociological and shifted to the psychological. That’s the main, and often only, way Hollywood and most television writers tell stories.
This is an important shift to dissect because whether we tell our stories primarily from a sociological or psychological point of view has great consequences for how we deal with our world and the problems we encounter.